<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189768</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that under Section 7B of the Indian Telegraph Act, an arbitrator is required to provide reasons for their award, especially in cases involving public interest or government disputes. Lack of reasons hinders judicial review and transparency. The Court set aside the arbitrator&#039;s award, instructing them to provide reasons. This ruling applies prospectively and does not affect previous awards under Section 7B. The appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189768</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that under Section 7B of the Indian Telegraph Act, an arbitrator is required to provide reasons for their award, especially in cases involving public interest or government disputes. Lack of reasons hinders judicial review and transparency. The Court set aside the arbitrator&#039;s award, instructing them to provide reasons. This ruling applies prospectively and does not affect previous awards under Section 7B. The appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>