https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189763 The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, ruling that it imposes reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression in the interests of public order. The Court found that the section penalizes deliberate and malicious insults to religion that outrage religious feelings, with the calculated tendency to disrupt public order. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application challenging the section's constitutionality, stating that it falls within the permissible legislative action affecting the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189763 The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, ruling that it imposes reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression in the interests of public order. The Court found that the section penalizes deliberate and malicious insults to religion that outrage religious feelings, with the calculated tendency to disrupt public order. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application challenging the section's constitutionality, stating that it falls within the permissible legislative action affecting the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189763