<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189759</link>
    <description>Preventive detention orders must disclose clear and specific satisfaction on the correct statutory ground, because &quot;public order&quot; and &quot;security of the State&quot; are distinct concepts and cannot be left in ambiguous disjunctive form. Use of &quot;public order or the security of the State&quot; may indicate mechanical reproduction of statutory language rather than reasoned application of mind. An order is also vulnerable if it relies on a ground that is merely a law-and-order incident and has no real nexus with the statutory heads for detention. Inclusion of an extraneous ground can vitiate the entire order because the requisite satisfaction may not be separable from it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189759</link>
      <description>Preventive detention orders must disclose clear and specific satisfaction on the correct statutory ground, because &quot;public order&quot; and &quot;security of the State&quot; are distinct concepts and cannot be left in ambiguous disjunctive form. Use of &quot;public order or the security of the State&quot; may indicate mechanical reproduction of statutory language rather than reasoned application of mind. An order is also vulnerable if it relies on a ground that is merely a law-and-order incident and has no real nexus with the statutory heads for detention. Inclusion of an extraneous ground can vitiate the entire order because the requisite satisfaction may not be separable from it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>