<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</link>
    <description>A dictated criminal judgment later transcribed and signed was treated as a procedural irregularity, not a jurisdictional defect, because the CrPC safeguards on pronouncement, dating, signing, and prompt supply of copies are meant to secure certainty and the right of appeal; where no failure of justice is shown, the conviction is not invalidated. The Court also accepted enforcement of prison and court rules requiring prisoner petitions to be routed through the Superintendent with the prescribed register endorsement, as those safeguards protect authenticity and prevent misuse. On the facts stated, the conviction and imprisonment were left undisturbed and the Registrar&#039;s refusal to place the post received petition before the Court was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</link>
      <description>A dictated criminal judgment later transcribed and signed was treated as a procedural irregularity, not a jurisdictional defect, because the CrPC safeguards on pronouncement, dating, signing, and prompt supply of copies are meant to secure certainty and the right of appeal; where no failure of justice is shown, the conviction is not invalidated. The Court also accepted enforcement of prison and court rules requiring prisoner petitions to be routed through the Superintendent with the prescribed register endorsement, as those safeguards protect authenticity and prevent misuse. On the facts stated, the conviction and imprisonment were left undisturbed and the Registrar&#039;s refusal to place the post received petition before the Court was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>