<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all three petitions, ruling that the procedural irregularities did not invalidate the conviction, and the petitioner was lawfully imprisoned. The court also upheld the Registrar&#039;s decision and stressed the importance of promptly providing judgment copies to the accused. Additionally, a copy of the judgment was ordered to be sent to the Registrar of the Bombay High Court for necessary action to ensure timely supply of judgment copies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all three petitions, ruling that the procedural irregularities did not invalidate the conviction, and the petitioner was lawfully imprisoned. The court also upheld the Registrar&#039;s decision and stressed the importance of promptly providing judgment copies to the accused. Additionally, a copy of the judgment was ordered to be sent to the Registrar of the Bombay High Court for necessary action to ensure timely supply of judgment copies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>