<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1197 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants the option to deposit required amounts within 30 days as per the proviso to Section 11AC. Failure to comply would result in liability to pay 100% of the duty demand towards penalty. The Tribunal determined that Section 11AC was not applicable, thus no need to reconsider the penalty imposed on the Director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1197 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants the option to deposit required amounts within 30 days as per the proviso to Section 11AC. Failure to comply would result in liability to pay 100% of the duty demand towards penalty. The Tribunal determined that Section 11AC was not applicable, thus no need to reconsider the penalty imposed on the Director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>