<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 951 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337871</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 remained entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act because its statutory classification as a primary agricultural credit society was ative. The jurisdictional High Court&#039;s binding view was that income-tax authorities cannot reopen that classification, and that conclusion governed the claim for Section 80P relief. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on banking activity and Section 80P(4) did not displace that position on the facts found. The appellate direction to allow the deduction was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 951 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337871</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 remained entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act because its statutory classification as a primary agricultural credit society was ative. The jurisdictional High Court&#039;s binding view was that income-tax authorities cannot reopen that classification, and that conclusion governed the claim for Section 80P relief. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on banking activity and Section 80P(4) did not displace that position on the facts found. The appellate direction to allow the deduction was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>