<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 933 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337853</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the AO&#039;s appeal and upheld the FAA&#039;s decisions regarding the deletion of additions of Rs. 2.65 crores on account of deemed income and Rs. 9.50 lakhs towards building number two of the police station. The ITAT concluded that the AO&#039;s additions were not justified as the income would only accrue upon the sale of the developed property, and expenses during a lull in business activities are common for developers and contractors. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was deemed infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 933 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337853</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the AO&#039;s appeal and upheld the FAA&#039;s decisions regarding the deletion of additions of Rs. 2.65 crores on account of deemed income and Rs. 9.50 lakhs towards building number two of the police station. The ITAT concluded that the AO&#039;s additions were not justified as the income would only accrue upon the sale of the developed property, and expenses during a lull in business activities are common for developers and contractors. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was deemed infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>