https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337851 A notice of motion seeking recall of an earlier speaking order was not maintainable where the applicant had not challenged the foundational orders that had already led to rejection of the appeal for non-removal of office objections. Treating the request as one for review, the HC held that no new evidence or mistake apparent on the record was shown, and the explanation offered merely repeated earlier administrative difficulties. Repetitive attempts to reopen a speaking order without sufficient cause were disapproved. The application was rejected and the finality of the earlier dismissal was affirmed. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337851 A notice of motion seeking recall of an earlier speaking order was not maintainable where the applicant had not challenged the foundational orders that had already led to rejection of the appeal for non-removal of office objections. Treating the request as one for review, the HC held that no new evidence or mistake apparent on the record was shown, and the explanation offered merely repeated earlier administrative difficulties. Repetitive attempts to reopen a speaking order without sufficient cause were disapproved. The application was rejected and the finality of the earlier dismissal was affirmed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337851