<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 930 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337850</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they constituted a change of opinion rather than being based on new facts. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, resolving the issues surrounding the jurisdiction of reopening assessments and the allowance of deductions under Section 80IB(8A) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 930 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337850</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they constituted a change of opinion rather than being based on new facts. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, resolving the issues surrounding the jurisdiction of reopening assessments and the allowance of deductions under Section 80IB(8A) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>