https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337848 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on Mandap Keeper Service. The penalties under Section 77 and 78 were set aside, but the penalty per return under Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules was upheld. The appellant rectified the short payment of tax post-audit, citing confusion and lack of guidance. Despite evidence of intention to pay tax, penalties under Section 77 and 78 were deemed unwarranted. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:29:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337848 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on Mandap Keeper Service. The penalties under Section 77 and 78 were set aside, but the penalty per return under Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules was upheld. The appellant rectified the short payment of tax post-audit, citing confusion and lack of guidance. Despite evidence of intention to pay tax, penalties under Section 77 and 78 were deemed unwarranted. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337848