<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 920 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337840</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal challenged the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for steel items used in the fabrication of supporting structures for capital goods. The Member (Technical) ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions and High Court judgments, setting aside the order denying the Cenvat credit. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in establishing the eligibility for Cenvat credit on the steel items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 920 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337840</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal challenged the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for steel items used in the fabrication of supporting structures for capital goods. The Member (Technical) ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions and High Court judgments, setting aside the order denying the Cenvat credit. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in establishing the eligibility for Cenvat credit on the steel items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>