<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 918 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on capital goods should be determined based on the dutiability of the final product at the time of receiving the goods. Since the capital goods were received and used for manufacturing dutiable goods before opting for exemption, the credit was deemed admissible. Relying on the decision in Spenta International Ltd. case, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of credit and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of the date of receipt of capital goods for credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 918 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on capital goods should be determined based on the dutiability of the final product at the time of receiving the goods. Since the capital goods were received and used for manufacturing dutiable goods before opting for exemption, the credit was deemed admissible. Relying on the decision in Spenta International Ltd. case, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of credit and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of the date of receipt of capital goods for credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>