<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 916 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s decision and providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal found that the appellant, registered as a trader with the sales tax authority, had sold imported goods in Daman area supported by documentary evidence of sales invoices. Emphasizing the misdirection of the first appellate authority, the Tribunal concluded that the initial decision was incorrect and not in accordance with the law, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 916 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s decision and providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal found that the appellant, registered as a trader with the sales tax authority, had sold imported goods in Daman area supported by documentary evidence of sales invoices. Emphasizing the misdirection of the first appellate authority, the Tribunal concluded that the initial decision was incorrect and not in accordance with the law, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>