<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 915 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337835</link>
    <description>Imported restricted secondhand diesel engines brought in without the required licence could be confiscated, and penalty was justified, because the transaction value was rejected on the basis of misdeclaration and expert appraiser assessment. The enhanced valuation was therefore upheld. Confiscation and penalty were maintained, but the redemption fine was considered excessive and reduced in line with the Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach to fix such fine at 20% of the enhanced value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 915 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337835</link>
      <description>Imported restricted secondhand diesel engines brought in without the required licence could be confiscated, and penalty was justified, because the transaction value was rejected on the basis of misdeclaration and expert appraiser assessment. The enhanced valuation was therefore upheld. Confiscation and penalty were maintained, but the redemption fine was considered excessive and reduced in line with the Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach to fix such fine at 20% of the enhanced value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>