<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the interest subsidy received under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUF Scheme) was capital in nature, intended to assist in acquiring new machinery for modernization. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the subsidy as a capital receipt for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the interest subsidy received under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUF Scheme) was capital in nature, intended to assist in acquiring new machinery for modernization. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the subsidy as a capital receipt for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>