<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1227 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98, holding that the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were invalid due to ambiguity in the show cause notices and lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for assessment year 1997-98 as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1227 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98, holding that the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were invalid due to ambiguity in the show cause notices and lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for assessment year 1997-98 as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>