<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189722</link>
    <description>Relief for double income-tax under section 49D is confined to the income that has actually borne tax in both jurisdictions. An amount computed for assessment purposes does not qualify as doubly taxed income if part of it was excluded by allowance or set-off before charge. The proper inquiry is the quantum that in fact suffered tax under both Malaya and India, not the entire amount attributed to the source. On that basis, only the smaller sum constituted doubly taxed income, and relief was available only to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189722</link>
      <description>Relief for double income-tax under section 49D is confined to the income that has actually borne tax in both jurisdictions. An amount computed for assessment purposes does not qualify as doubly taxed income if part of it was excluded by allowance or set-off before charge. The proper inquiry is the quantum that in fact suffered tax under both Malaya and India, not the entire amount attributed to the source. On that basis, only the smaller sum constituted doubly taxed income, and relief was available only to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>