https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189714 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld.CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) to the extent of &8377; 14,91,489/-, as the payments made were genuine reimbursements of actual expenses incurred by the C&F Agent on behalf of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, finding no specific error to indicate that the amount in question did not represent actual reimbursement of expenses. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:05:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189714 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld.CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) to the extent of &8377; 14,91,489/-, as the payments made were genuine reimbursements of actual expenses incurred by the C&F Agent on behalf of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, finding no specific error to indicate that the amount in question did not represent actual reimbursement of expenses. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189714