https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337801 The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to extend the stay beyond 365 days in the Income Tax Act case, emphasizing that delays not caused by the assessee could warrant such extensions. It deemed the provision mandating stay vacation after 365 days as discriminatory and in violation of the assessee's rights under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of timely appeals disposal and considering reasons for delays. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:45:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337801 The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to extend the stay beyond 365 days in the Income Tax Act case, emphasizing that delays not caused by the assessee could warrant such extensions. It deemed the provision mandating stay vacation after 365 days as discriminatory and in violation of the assessee's rights under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of timely appeals disposal and considering reasons for delays. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337801