<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6480</link>
    <description>For valuation under section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, the balance-sheet figure is not conclusive, but it may be adjusted only on reliable material showing that it does not reflect the true value on the valuation date. A mere claim that depreciable assets were not fully depreciated in the accounts because profits were insufficient is not enough to replace the balance-sheet value with the written down value under the Income-tax Act. The assessee must show that the balance-sheet value is artificially inflated and that the written down value is the proper wealth-tax value. The written down value could not be substituted automatically, and the issue was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6480</link>
      <description>For valuation under section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, the balance-sheet figure is not conclusive, but it may be adjusted only on reliable material showing that it does not reflect the true value on the valuation date. A mere claim that depreciable assets were not fully depreciated in the accounts because profits were insufficient is not enough to replace the balance-sheet value with the written down value under the Income-tax Act. The assessee must show that the balance-sheet value is artificially inflated and that the written down value is the proper wealth-tax value. The written down value could not be substituted automatically, and the issue was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>