<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 871 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337791</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to comply with procedural formalities, resulting in a delayed conditional order of dismissal. Despite attempts to set aside the dismissal order after a significant delay, the Court found the lack of sufficient cause for the delay unacceptable. The Court emphasized the need for legitimate reasons for seeking restoration of the appeal and highlighted advocates&#039; responsibility in ensuring procedural compliance. With an unexplained delay of 776 days, the Court deemed the cause for restoration not bona fide, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the Notice of Motion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 871 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337791</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to comply with procedural formalities, resulting in a delayed conditional order of dismissal. Despite attempts to set aside the dismissal order after a significant delay, the Court found the lack of sufficient cause for the delay unacceptable. The Court emphasized the need for legitimate reasons for seeking restoration of the appeal and highlighted advocates&#039; responsibility in ensuring procedural compliance. With an unexplained delay of 776 days, the Court deemed the cause for restoration not bona fide, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the Notice of Motion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>