<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 870 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337790</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appellant, a manufacturer of Copper Winding Wires, was not liable to reverse Cenvat credit on goods removed as scrap. The Tribunal found that since the appellant voluntarily paid the differential duty without deliberate suppression or fraud, no Show Cause Notice was necessary under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant any consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 870 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337790</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appellant, a manufacturer of Copper Winding Wires, was not liable to reverse Cenvat credit on goods removed as scrap. The Tribunal found that since the appellant voluntarily paid the differential duty without deliberate suppression or fraud, no Show Cause Notice was necessary under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant any consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>