<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 867 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337787</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Disciplinary Authority&#039;s findings due to lack of evidence and procedural flaws. The impugned orders were overturned, directing the respondent to consider the interim stay period as duty time with full benefits. The respondent was instructed to issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The writ petitions were granted without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 867 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337787</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Disciplinary Authority&#039;s findings due to lack of evidence and procedural flaws. The impugned orders were overturned, directing the respondent to consider the interim stay period as duty time with full benefits. The respondent was instructed to issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The writ petitions were granted without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>