https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337784 In an NDPS appeal against acquittal, the Delhi High Court noted that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and found material infirmities in arrest, summons service, the Section 67 statement, recovery of contraband, custody and movement of case property, and the alleged controlled delivery. The evidence was also unsafe due to witness inconsistencies and lack of reliable corroboration. As the presumption of innocence is reinforced after acquittal and two views were possible, the court declined interference and affirmed the Trial Court's acquittal. en-us Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:38:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337784 In an NDPS appeal against acquittal, the Delhi High Court noted that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and found material infirmities in arrest, summons service, the Section 67 statement, recovery of contraband, custody and movement of case property, and the alleged controlled delivery. The evidence was also unsafe due to witness inconsistencies and lack of reliable corroboration. As the presumption of innocence is reinforced after acquittal and two views were possible, the court declined interference and affirmed the Trial Court's acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337784