<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 863 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337783</link>
    <description>In an NDPS bail matter under Section 439 CrPC, the HC granted regular bail during trial, relying on the petitioner&#039;s period of incarceration and the fact that statutory bail had already been allowed in the same FIR. The Court noted the objection about the search officer&#039;s competence but declined to decide that issue at the bail stage. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to bail pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 863 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337783</link>
      <description>In an NDPS bail matter under Section 439 CrPC, the HC granted regular bail during trial, relying on the petitioner&#039;s period of incarceration and the fact that statutory bail had already been allowed in the same FIR. The Court noted the objection about the search officer&#039;s competence but declined to decide that issue at the bail stage. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to bail pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>