<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1268 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189702</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Original Authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent, a Private Ltd. Co., in a dispute over Central Excise duty valuation on sales to M/s. Tehri Steel Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as there was no evidence of a relationship or financial connection between the parties to justify differential duty demands. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete proof to establish related party transactions for excise duty valuation, highlighting the significance of legal provisions and factual findings in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1268 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189702</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Original Authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent, a Private Ltd. Co., in a dispute over Central Excise duty valuation on sales to M/s. Tehri Steel Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as there was no evidence of a relationship or financial connection between the parties to justify differential duty demands. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete proof to establish related party transactions for excise duty valuation, highlighting the significance of legal provisions and factual findings in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>