<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The AO was directed to compute the capital gain as per the registered valuer&#039;s report, adhering to the legal precedent set by the Bombay High Court in Puja Prints. The decision emphasized the correct application of Section 55A and the importance of reliable valuation methodologies in determining fair market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The AO was directed to compute the capital gain as per the registered valuer&#039;s report, adhering to the legal precedent set by the Bombay High Court in Puja Prints. The decision emphasized the correct application of Section 55A and the importance of reliable valuation methodologies in determining fair market value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>