<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189700</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s interim order in a case involving the award of a contract for the design and supply of large diameter pipes and steel tanks for a thermal power station. The Court emphasized the importance of public interest, commercial considerations, and limited judicial review in such matters. It ruled in favor of the bidder recommended by the Board of Directors, highlighting the absence of mala fides and the legitimate decision-making process. The Court directed the unsuccessful bidder to pay the costs of the appeals, stressing the consequences of judicial intervention in public contract awards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189700</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s interim order in a case involving the award of a contract for the design and supply of large diameter pipes and steel tanks for a thermal power station. The Court emphasized the importance of public interest, commercial considerations, and limited judicial review in such matters. It ruled in favor of the bidder recommended by the Board of Directors, highlighting the absence of mala fides and the legitimate decision-making process. The Court directed the unsuccessful bidder to pay the costs of the appeals, stressing the consequences of judicial intervention in public contract awards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>