https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189699 Order 41 Rule 22 permits a respondent without a cross-appeal only to support the decree, not to challenge adverse findings or unsettle matters that have become final. Order 41 Rule 33 is a broad but discretionary power to do complete justice and avoid inconsistent or unworkable decrees, but it cannot be used to reopen settled issues merely because the appellate court disagrees with the lower court. Where the State filed neither an appeal nor a cross-objection, the finding in favour of the landholder on allotment of units could not be reversed, and interference with that finding was unjustified. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:21:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189699 Order 41 Rule 22 permits a respondent without a cross-appeal only to support the decree, not to challenge adverse findings or unsettle matters that have become final. Order 41 Rule 33 is a broad but discretionary power to do complete justice and avoid inconsistent or unworkable decrees, but it cannot be used to reopen settled issues merely because the appellate court disagrees with the lower court. Where the State filed neither an appeal nor a cross-objection, the finding in favour of the landholder on allotment of units could not be reversed, and interference with that finding was unjustified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189699