https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189695 Where a High Court is faced with rival readings of an earlier judgment, it must decide the pending writ petition on its own merits rather than decline adjudication and send the parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. The earlier judgment was treated as clear enough not to require clarification, so the impugned order was set aside and the writ petition restored for expeditious merits determination. Interim protection was preserved by directing continuation of payment of the last drawn salary to the concerned employees until the writ petition is decided. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189695 Where a High Court is faced with rival readings of an earlier judgment, it must decide the pending writ petition on its own merits rather than decline adjudication and send the parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. The earlier judgment was treated as clear enough not to require clarification, so the impugned order was set aside and the writ petition restored for expeditious merits determination. Interim protection was preserved by directing continuation of payment of the last drawn salary to the concerned employees until the writ petition is decided. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189695