https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189694 In a public fraud investigation concerning the 2G-related cases, the Supreme Court upheld its earlier directions issued under Articles 136 and 142 to support a court-monitored investigation and day-to-day trial. It held that the orders were not liable to be recalled because no material error or injustice was shown, and they were aimed at ensuring an effective investigation and uninterrupted trial progress. The Court also ruled that the directions did not impermissibly extinguish the parties' ability to approach the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 or invoke Section 482 CrPC, since parallel proceedings could not be used to derail the monitored process. No further guidelines were required. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2023 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189694 In a public fraud investigation concerning the 2G-related cases, the Supreme Court upheld its earlier directions issued under Articles 136 and 142 to support a court-monitored investigation and day-to-day trial. It held that the orders were not liable to be recalled because no material error or injustice was shown, and they were aimed at ensuring an effective investigation and uninterrupted trial progress. The Court also ruled that the directions did not impermissibly extinguish the parties' ability to approach the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 or invoke Section 482 CrPC, since parallel proceedings could not be used to derail the monitored process. No further guidelines were required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189694