<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1148 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189690</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, overturning the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s decision to set aside transfer orders of employees to a Hydroelectric Project. The Court held that the transfers were lawful and in the public interest, emphasizing the necessity of transfers for administrative efficiency. It rejected claims of malafides and upheld the Corporation&#039;s authority to make transfer decisions within its service rules. The employees&#039; challenge based on seniority rights was dismissed, affirming the Corporation&#039;s discretion in transfer matters and limiting judicial interference in such administrative decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1148 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189690</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, overturning the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s decision to set aside transfer orders of employees to a Hydroelectric Project. The Court held that the transfers were lawful and in the public interest, emphasizing the necessity of transfers for administrative efficiency. It rejected claims of malafides and upheld the Corporation&#039;s authority to make transfer decisions within its service rules. The employees&#039; challenge based on seniority rights was dismissed, affirming the Corporation&#039;s discretion in transfer matters and limiting judicial interference in such administrative decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>