<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337781</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, modifying the disallowances under section 14A and Rule 8D by directing a 1% disallowance of dividend income. The disallowance of expenditure on repairs and maintenance was upheld due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the ITAT Mumbai confirmed the decisions made by the FAA regarding the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:17:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337781</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, modifying the disallowances under section 14A and Rule 8D by directing a 1% disallowance of dividend income. The disallowance of expenditure on repairs and maintenance was upheld due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the ITAT Mumbai confirmed the decisions made by the FAA regarding the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>