<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 851 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2008-09. It held that the reopening was invalid due to a clear case of change of opinion on the same set of facts. Additionally, it concluded that the AO&#039;s reference to the DVO under section 55A of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal upheld the decision to cancel the reopening and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the jurisdictional ruling and declining further adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 851 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2008-09. It held that the reopening was invalid due to a clear case of change of opinion on the same set of facts. Additionally, it concluded that the AO&#039;s reference to the DVO under section 55A of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal upheld the decision to cancel the reopening and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the jurisdictional ruling and declining further adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>