<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 842 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision regarding related party transactions and the reassessment of assessable value for goods. The Tribunal found that Rule 8 and Rule 9 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules were not applicable in the case, rendering the show cause notices unsustainable. The decision emphasized the necessity of applying relevant provisions accurately in cases involving related party transactions to determine assessable value correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 07:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 842 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision regarding related party transactions and the reassessment of assessable value for goods. The Tribunal found that Rule 8 and Rule 9 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules were not applicable in the case, rendering the show cause notices unsustainable. The decision emphasized the necessity of applying relevant provisions accurately in cases involving related party transactions to determine assessable value correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>