<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1220 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189664</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A and delete disallowances related to the Kavesar Unit. The court criticized the Revenue for lack of justification in the appeal and emphasized the need for uniform application of law. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to ensure compliance with the court&#039;s orders, with a warning of potential costs for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1220 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189664</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A and delete disallowances related to the Kavesar Unit. The court criticized the Revenue for lack of justification in the appeal and emphasized the need for uniform application of law. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to ensure compliance with the court&#039;s orders, with a warning of potential costs for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>