https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189661 SC commentary on Chapter IVA transport regulation states that prolonged and unexplained delay in deciding a scheme under section 68D can justify judicial intervention to secure prompt disposal, because the statutory process is meant to be resolved speedily in the public interest. It also notes that where the Regional Transport Authority has found a need for additional services and granted temporary permits under section 68F(1C), cancellation of those permits is unsustainable if based only on technical objections arising from an unresolved scheme and contrary to pressing public transport needs. The temporary permits were restored, and the State Government was directed to complete the statutory decision within the time fixed, failing which the scheme would stand quashed. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:31:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189661 SC commentary on Chapter IVA transport regulation states that prolonged and unexplained delay in deciding a scheme under section 68D can justify judicial intervention to secure prompt disposal, because the statutory process is meant to be resolved speedily in the public interest. It also notes that where the Regional Transport Authority has found a need for additional services and granted temporary permits under section 68F(1C), cancellation of those permits is unsustainable if based only on technical objections arising from an unresolved scheme and contrary to pressing public transport needs. The temporary permits were restored, and the State Government was directed to complete the statutory decision within the time fixed, failing which the scheme would stand quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189661