https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189656 Pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 abated on the commencement of the Repeal Act, because the statutory exception in Section 4 applies only where possession of the surplus land had already been taken over by the State or its ory. The record showed no material that the State had taken possession, and the interim status quo and absence of a contrary reply supported continued possession with the landholder. As the exception to abatement was not established, the proceedings could not continue and the appeals succeeded on that basis. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:47:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189656 Pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 abated on the commencement of the Repeal Act, because the statutory exception in Section 4 applies only where possession of the surplus land had already been taken over by the State or its ory. The record showed no material that the State had taken possession, and the interim status quo and absence of a contrary reply supported continued possession with the landholder. As the exception to abatement was not established, the proceedings could not continue and the appeals succeeded on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189656