<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 323 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189646</link>
    <description>A government-created, government-financed and pervasively controlled body was treated as an instrumentality of the State under Article 12, making writ jurisdiction available. Professors already holding the posts were held entitled to the revised pay scale attached to the post, and fresh selection for incumbents was rejected as arbitrary and discriminatory. A selection was invalidated where the candidate lacked the essential experience qualification and no lawful relaxation power was shown; consequential pay protection and faculty membership relief followed. Selection rules requiring aggregate marks could not be overridden by imposing minimum viva voce qualifying marks, and only prospective reconsideration of unfilled vacancies was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 323 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189646</link>
      <description>A government-created, government-financed and pervasively controlled body was treated as an instrumentality of the State under Article 12, making writ jurisdiction available. Professors already holding the posts were held entitled to the revised pay scale attached to the post, and fresh selection for incumbents was rejected as arbitrary and discriminatory. A selection was invalidated where the candidate lacked the essential experience qualification and no lawful relaxation power was shown; consequential pay protection and faculty membership relief followed. Selection rules requiring aggregate marks could not be overridden by imposing minimum viva voce qualifying marks, and only prospective reconsideration of unfilled vacancies was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>