<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 813 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the second notice under section 148 invalid due to ongoing reassessment proceedings from the first notice, annulling the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and further examination of various additions related to unexplained investments, interest payments, and household expenditures was unnecessary. The decision focused on the procedural validity of the reassessment notices, leading to the annulment of the order dated 27.03.2000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 813 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the second notice under section 148 invalid due to ongoing reassessment proceedings from the first notice, annulling the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and further examination of various additions related to unexplained investments, interest payments, and household expenditures was unnecessary. The decision focused on the procedural validity of the reassessment notices, leading to the annulment of the order dated 27.03.2000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>