<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 803 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337723</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because it was booked through Cargo Sales Reports where those reports only consolidated underlying Air Way Bills containing the particulars required under the service tax rules. The Air Way Bills satisfied the essential invoice requirements, and the Department did not dispute that the credit represented tax actually suffered or that the figures matched the underlying documents. The procedural requirement was therefore substantially met, and minor documentary inadequacy could not override the substantive entitlement to credit. On that basis, the credit and its utilisation were treated as proper and the demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 803 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337723</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because it was booked through Cargo Sales Reports where those reports only consolidated underlying Air Way Bills containing the particulars required under the service tax rules. The Air Way Bills satisfied the essential invoice requirements, and the Department did not dispute that the credit represented tax actually suffered or that the figures matched the underlying documents. The procedural requirement was therefore substantially met, and minor documentary inadequacy could not override the substantive entitlement to credit. On that basis, the credit and its utilisation were treated as proper and the demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>