<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 801 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for products exempt under specific notifications, despite installation after the products became exempt. The judgment emphasized determining credit eligibility at the time of receiving capital goods, as established by previous tribunal and Supreme Court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 801 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for products exempt under specific notifications, despite installation after the products became exempt. The judgment emphasized determining credit eligibility at the time of receiving capital goods, as established by previous tribunal and Supreme Court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>