<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 788 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337708</link>
    <description>Where no complaint under Section 135 of the Customs Act had yet been filed, the High Court declined to grant substantive relief under Section 482 CrPC or to quash the pending investigation-related restraints. The article notes allegations of fraudulent vehicle imports, misdeclaration, undervaluation, and duty evasion, together with bail conditions requiring cooperation, periodic appearance before the DRI, and surrender of passport. It also records reliance on Customs Circular No. 27/2015 and the need for authorities to proceed in accordance with the prosecution guidelines, while recognising the passage of time and hardship to the applicant. The application was disposed of without granting the ancillary prayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 788 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337708</link>
      <description>Where no complaint under Section 135 of the Customs Act had yet been filed, the High Court declined to grant substantive relief under Section 482 CrPC or to quash the pending investigation-related restraints. The article notes allegations of fraudulent vehicle imports, misdeclaration, undervaluation, and duty evasion, together with bail conditions requiring cooperation, periodic appearance before the DRI, and surrender of passport. It also records reliance on Customs Circular No. 27/2015 and the need for authorities to proceed in accordance with the prosecution guidelines, while recognising the passage of time and hardship to the applicant. The application was disposed of without granting the ancillary prayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>