<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337707</link>
    <description>The court directed the EPCG Committee to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s representation by issuing a speaking order, providing a personal hearing to the petitioner&#039;s representative. The Committee was instructed not to take coercive measures against the petitioner for four weeks until the representation was resolved. The judgment emphasizes procedural fairness, the right to be heard, transparency, and accountability in administrative decision-making. It also highlights the importance of access to justice and the right to challenge orders through legal remedies, underscoring the significance of upholding procedural justice in legal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337707</link>
      <description>The court directed the EPCG Committee to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s representation by issuing a speaking order, providing a personal hearing to the petitioner&#039;s representative. The Committee was instructed not to take coercive measures against the petitioner for four weeks until the representation was resolved. The judgment emphasizes procedural fairness, the right to be heard, transparency, and accountability in administrative decision-making. It also highlights the importance of access to justice and the right to challenge orders through legal remedies, underscoring the significance of upholding procedural justice in legal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>