<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 784 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337704</link>
    <description>Defatted soya hypro products, defatted soya flakes and defatted soya grits were treated as covered by the generic entry for &quot;deoiled cake including soya meal&quot; in the Madhya Pradesh VAT Schedule I because they were only modified forms of deoiled cake, with no added ingredient or material change in chemical composition. Different commercial names and a higher market price were held insufficient to create distinct taxable commodities. The common parlance test was found inapposite on the facts, and end use could not override a specific tariff entry. The impugned classification orders were therefore unsustainable, and the products were held entitled to the tax treatment applicable to deoiled cake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 784 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337704</link>
      <description>Defatted soya hypro products, defatted soya flakes and defatted soya grits were treated as covered by the generic entry for &quot;deoiled cake including soya meal&quot; in the Madhya Pradesh VAT Schedule I because they were only modified forms of deoiled cake, with no added ingredient or material change in chemical composition. Different commercial names and a higher market price were held insufficient to create distinct taxable commodities. The common parlance test was found inapposite on the facts, and end use could not override a specific tariff entry. The impugned classification orders were therefore unsustainable, and the products were held entitled to the tax treatment applicable to deoiled cake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>