<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 859 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the deduction claim u/s 80IB (10) for a housing project, based on the project approval predating relevant amendments and the TDR received being solely for residential purposes. The lack of documentary evidence to substantiate payments was deemed irrelevant as not raised earlier. Following precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deduction claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 859 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the deduction claim u/s 80IB (10) for a housing project, based on the project approval predating relevant amendments and the TDR received being solely for residential purposes. The lack of documentary evidence to substantiate payments was deemed irrelevant as not raised earlier. Following precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deduction claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>