https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189623 Section 53-A and section 57 of the C. P. and Berar Municipalities Act operated in different fields: section 53-A permitted temporary appointment of an Executive Officer and allocation of powers without dissolving the municipality, while section 57 concerned dissolution or supersession of the committee. The notification appointing an Executive Officer was therefore treated as valid under section 53-A and not as a disguised supersession order. Action under section 53-A was also held administrative, because the statute left the matter to governmental assessment of competence and expediency and did not require a prior hearing. The challenge to the notification failed and costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:32:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189623 Section 53-A and section 57 of the C. P. and Berar Municipalities Act operated in different fields: section 53-A permitted temporary appointment of an Executive Officer and allocation of powers without dissolving the municipality, while section 57 concerned dissolution or supersession of the committee. The notification appointing an Executive Officer was therefore treated as valid under section 53-A and not as a disguised supersession order. Action under section 53-A was also held administrative, because the statute left the matter to governmental assessment of competence and expediency and did not require a prior hearing. The challenge to the notification failed and costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189623