https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189622 Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, once the appropriate Government validly makes a reference under section 10(1)(d), control of the dispute passes to the tribunal and the reference cannot be cancelled, superseded, or withdrawn by the Government before adjudication concludes. The statutory scheme governing commencement, pendency, awards, and expeditious disposal was treated as inconsistent with any implied executive power to terminate a pending reference. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was held inapplicable because the context of the Act excluded such implication. Alleged bona fides could not cure the absence of statutory authority. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:50:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189622 Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, once the appropriate Government validly makes a reference under section 10(1)(d), control of the dispute passes to the tribunal and the reference cannot be cancelled, superseded, or withdrawn by the Government before adjudication concludes. The statutory scheme governing commencement, pendency, awards, and expeditious disposal was treated as inconsistent with any implied executive power to terminate a pending reference. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was held inapplicable because the context of the Act excluded such implication. Alleged bona fides could not cure the absence of statutory authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189622