<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6454</link>
    <description>Recovery proceedings against legal representatives were treated as valid where the authority to recover tax dues existed, even though the notices cited an incorrect provision and part of the demand arose under earlier enactments. The Court noted that recovery notices were only preliminary steps and that the statutory scheme permitted use of the corresponding recovery machinery, including procedures traceable to the Travancore enactment where applicable. The attachment was also not void merely because some demand certificates were issued after the assessee&#039;s death or because title and other factual objections were raised; those objections had to be pursued through the prescribed objection procedure in the recovery process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6454</link>
      <description>Recovery proceedings against legal representatives were treated as valid where the authority to recover tax dues existed, even though the notices cited an incorrect provision and part of the demand arose under earlier enactments. The Court noted that recovery notices were only preliminary steps and that the statutory scheme permitted use of the corresponding recovery machinery, including procedures traceable to the Travancore enactment where applicable. The attachment was also not void merely because some demand certificates were issued after the assessee&#039;s death or because title and other factual objections were raised; those objections had to be pursued through the prescribed objection procedure in the recovery process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>