<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 781 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,56,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and dismissing the ground related to the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 47,180. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal reasonable and held that the Assessing Officer lacked substantive evidence to justify the addition under Section 68, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 781 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,56,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and dismissing the ground related to the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 47,180. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal reasonable and held that the Assessing Officer lacked substantive evidence to justify the addition under Section 68, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>